A Push for CHANGE on Blurt: Fake Satire, Real Censorship, and ENOUGH Hypocrisy?

Hello everyone! An input for CHANGE on Blurt, for anyone regardless of your role.

🙈 🙉 🙊 🤡 😱 🤡 🙈 ✍️ 🙉 ✍️ 🙊 🤡 😱 🤡 🙈 🙉 🙊

Hello @yayogerardo, I stumbled upon your post from two months ago by chance: 🧐 🤔

It’s meant to be satirical-intellectual, but I struggle to grasp its positioning. Not out of laziness: after analyzing the contradictory content, I smile not because it fails at satire, but because 90% of your posts are upvoted by witnesses or influential accounts with systematic, punctual regularity.

Smiling further, I notice you criticize Hive and previously Steem , yet you replicate the exact same system on Blurt. Worse: 80% of you camouflage yourselves on Hive and similar platforms, keeping a foot in multiple worlds. Your account is everywhere, but lacks a truly distinctive satirical identity. It’s a shame you "play" these posts to solicit upvotes from peers—not for merit, but out of benevolence or pity.

Unfortunately, even by faking a message saying the opposite of what really happens , it’s time to drop this phony creativity. Let’s return to the REAL world: study up, especially on web legality and technicalities. Or stay in your circle with fake satire, confusing apples for oranges without contextualizing real events and timelines.

I hope you find your path, and that you’re not just a multi-account hustling for self-promotion after failing on countless socials . True art is something else.

For free information proud to be "attacked" by types like you : On Blurt, just like Hive, there’s CENSORSHIP and control by powerful witnesses with massive delegations. I’m living proof—censored for defending a user insulted without reason. I believe I’m the only one so far.

PS: The censor is the same ex-Hive bigwig who fought TheMarkyMark here his arch-nemesis , but adopted the same tactics: blocked me from the group just for questioning MULTI-ACCOUNTS and WITNESSES.

Hypocrisy on Blurt is real and current: From those who censor, those who ignore it, those who do fake satire without addressing the real issue, and those who upvote indiscriminately for reciprocation. Art and MERITOCRACY are something else—without INTELLECTUAL HONESTY. To a legitimate question even asked on Hive , just answer!

Multi-accounts with delegations can self-upvote, keeping preferred witnesses permanently at the top and blocking others from climbing. The fear is telling the TRUTH to users, assuming they’re "stupid." Here’s a Web3 taste and the effects of Blurt CENSORSHIP on a single user:

1 Comments shadowed in the group. 2 Inability to reply to the admin who did it illegally and cowardly . 3 Low reputation warning . 4 No post creation in that group. 5 General usage limits on Blurt few active groups .

Blurt 1 : 👉

Blurt 2: 👉

Blurt 3: 👉

If you truly want to be useful—like few here on Blurt—you could help ALL users REMEMBER, USERS ARE THE FORCE OF EVERY PROJECT by showing INTELLECTUAL HONESTY through "CONSTRUCTIVE SATIRE" on Blurt's flaws.

Alternatively, if you want a more serious path with INTELLECTUAL HONESTY, take inspiration from my early Hive investigations into the FRAUDULENT system. As mentioned, it happens on BLURT in a WORSE and more DANGEROUS way—not just for participating users, but for the entire CRYPTO and WEB3 market.

Hive Article 1: 👉

Hive Article 2: 👉

Dearest @yayogerardo, I hope in the future you’ll be more INTELLECTUALLY HONEST and tag my nick when featuring me in your "satirical works," so I can join the conversation. That way, I’ll have the chance to share my opinion—without missing the timing, as I only stumbled on your "work" by chance after 2 months. Use your "satirical art" on BLURT's flaws too. I do it on any platform, without distinctions. I don’t care about upvotes or protecting anyone. The world is beautiful because it’s varied, but FREE and INDEPENDENT information—as I said on Hive—CANNOT BE CENSORED.

Let’s tag those who encouraged your work with comments: @amaterasusolar @squirrelbait @frankbacon—so they can interact with INTELLECTUAL HONESTY. I’ve met some on Hive; they thought that since I was fighting Hive exposing truths via investigations , I shouldn’t critique Blurt or figures from other platforms who also practice CENSORSHIP. Fortunately, we all have different life experiences and cultures. The key is RESPECT for EVERYONE. If you support those without RESPECT and encourage DISRESPECT toward users, it explains why Blurt stalls after all these years instead of advancing. Sadly, those in charge lack the necessary experience to evolve the project, its users, and the surrounding interest. Many users have offered solutions, but NONE have EVER been implemented.

I believe I’ve dedicated enough time and been thorough. So, I wish you, your "satirical art," your systematic supporters, and especially TheMarkyMark’s twin on Blurt—a great continuation!

Best wishes, and remember:

📺 Follow Commenta La Notizia for deeper insights, global analysis, and fearless discussions about the issues that shape our world — from politics and technology to society and the hidden forces behind the headlines. ⚠️ Legal Notice This article and the related multimedia content are the exclusive property of the author. Copying, reproduction, distribution, or modification in any form or on any platform is prohibited without written permission. Copyright © CondividiSulWeb – YouTube Commenta La Notizia ═══════════════════════════════════════════ 👤 Author: @condividisulweb ✍️ Commenta La Notizia is my editorial project created to provide clear and engaging insights into news, events, and major current issues. Every article, video, and short is made with a clear goal: not only to inform, but also to give context, reflection points, and analysis to understand not just what happens, but espec…

📰 Comment, share, stay informed.

🙏 Thank you for reading: your time and your opinion are the true value ═══════════════════════════════════════════ ✍️ SUPPORT FREE INFORMATION ✍️