Direct Continuation: The Illumination Of The Shadow Chapter Nine Conclusion: Building The One World Spiritual Community

<center </center Source</center

<center <h2 <b A Glimpse Of The Future?</b </h2 </center

<center <b This is the conclusion to chapter nine - the first part can be found HERE.</b </center

<center Although an extreme example, the previous observations are indicative of a template they've been refining advancing/retreating and ranging between idealism and totalitarianism over multiple generations. This is their envisioned "golden age" - one that if they achieve their desired digital economy, I.D, and caveat fueled universal basic income is intended to be increasingly difficult to operate outside of. A system that's sole purpose is the consummation and absorption of the all into the multiplicity of the one - the romanticised and oversimplified oneness <b repeat after me, "we are one!"</b of the one world order.</center

“This may be the time to consider a universal basic wage which would acknowledge and dignify the noble, essential tasks you carry out. It would ensure and concretely achieve the ideal, at once so human and so Christian, of no worker without rights,” Pope Francis

<center <b As per the synarchy of previous chapters and the peasant villages of Ríos Montt, if you're not an adhering and productive member of their big society - you are not only an impediment to its realisation - you are the enemy. As highlighted in part one: the public are already being psychologically prepared for this new control structure. "Transgressors of social law are tried and hung in the court of public opinion, careers and lives destroyed without recourse or trial".</b </center </b </center

Leave no one behind LNOB is the central, transformative promise of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its Sustainable Development Goals SDGs . Source

<center Following a hyper inflationary collapse of the debt market, private ownership is intended to become absorbed into the communitarian model, stakeholder community ownership, manifested around the benevolence of the corporate entity and the diktats of a global to local community that seeks the control of private residences, assets, resources, and narratives.</b </center

<center Consider, we are being incrementally ushered towards a paradigm where a manipulated consensus mindset will be increasingly led to believe that for a contrived greater good they have a stake in individual outcomes. Imagine a future where the community the corporation and its localised communitarians i.e the pre-programmed global citzen has a stake in our personal values, convictions, health, finances, employment, and housing requirements? Currently, this may be difficult to comprehend, but I point you to an envisioned future of 2050, where following a monumental collapse/crisis the remnants of humanity will have been corralled into smart habitation zones. </b </center

<center </center Source

<center So far so dystopian, but in truth, we won't have to wait that long - and the global citzens are cheering it on. Here in the UK, we are observing the creation of "15-minute neighbourhoods. This is just one aspect of a multifarious evolving process that's ultimately intended to force people out of their private vehicles and into habitation zones. I also contend that once fully in place, through climate lockdowns which as we shall observe will begin with certain days of the week and "climate emergencies" heatwaves etc etc you will find yourself "locked down" within your designated zone with increasing regularity. Of course, it's all for the "greater good" - isn't it?</center

<center <b These proposals are enabled by the fake citizens assemblies whose financial connections to Google, Open Society, Wellcome, and Carnegie UK, I documented a few years back that exist to manufacture the illusion of a consensus.</b </center

A radical vision drawn up by council bosses to tackle congestion in Canterbury will see the city split into five separate zones - with residents banned from driving directly between each. Motorists will be unable to make simple journeys across the city, and will face fines enforced using number-plate recognition cameras if they break the authority's proposed rules. Source

<center <b Oxford</b </center

ROAD blocks stopping most motorists from driving through Oxford city centre will divide the city into six "15 minute" neighbourhoods, a county council travel chief has said. And he insisted the controversial plan would go ahead whether people liked it or not. Duncan Enright, Oxfordshire County Council's cabinet member for travel and development strategy, explained the authority's traffic filter proposals in an interview in The Sunday Times. He said the filters would turn Oxford into "a 15-minute city" with local services within a small walking radius. Source

Now the council is fighting back with plans to divide the city into six districts from next August with strict rules on how often motorists can drive outside their neighbourhood. Source

<center <b The connection between this section and the other aspects of this post being that there is no seperation, its all part of the same global to local action plan!</b </center

<center Anyone that's been following me since my steemit days may remember that I spoke out about this proposal several years ago - oft to deafening silence. Well, it's here, its intended reach is global, and its being rolled out with increasing haste. I'll leave this section with the observation of the person below. What they fail to comprehend is that it's meant to be "disasterous for business" - the cumulative effect of the last few years is intended to ensure that nothing outside the corporate entity will survive. The few that do survive, eventually strangled by the red tape of environmental governance.</center

Hotelier Jeremy Mogford, who owns the Old Bank Hotel in High Street and the Old Parsonage Hotel and Gees, both in Banbury Road, described the plan as disastrous for business. Source

<center </center Source

<center <h2 <b Final Thoughts</b </h2 </center

<center The word Church not to say that there aren't many good churches, and a genuine war for the soul of the church would appear to be a mistranslation/misappropriation of the word ecclesia, which equates to congregation and fellowship, and in no way speaks to hierarchy and state/royal/government/military affiliations, God bless America! God save the Queen!!</center

Ecclesia or Ekklesia in Christian theology means both: a particular body of faithful people, and the whole body of the faithful. Latin ecclesia, from Greek ekklesia, where the word is a compound of two segments: "ek", a preposition meaning "out of", and a verb, "kaleo", signifying "to call" - together, literally, "to call out". That usage soon disappeared and was replaced with "assembly, congregation, the council", or "convocation". Source

<center <b In terms of Christ, in the age of inversion, am I prepared to revisit the words of one of the most debunked, maligned, and ridiculed figures in popular culture? Yes I am!</b </center

<center In the name of God, the divisive nature of mankind's religious interpretations has been used as the justification to dehumanise the heretics that question the consensus, control populations, fight wars, slaughter the innocents, conquer civilisations, colonise, and accumulate materialistic wealth and power.</center

<center </center Source

<center That said, anyone that lays the blame of abuse and persecution at the feet of religion, and believes that once we have unshackled ourselves from their perceived perceptual burdens we will be free to embrace a rose tinted future, is either incredibly naive or willfully ignorant. In tandem with the historical deceptions that precede the formation of religious doctrine, from the bookends of Mao and Stalin, I have counted 64 wars/persecutions and millions of deaths in a century that has been our most blood-soaked and Godless.</center

<center <b Whilst everyone seeks something/someone to blame, who is brave enough to look within? To consider the nature and falibility of their own psychology?</b </center

<center Whilst the demonisation of religion is now en vogue, there was a time when people turned a blind eye to what they should have rallied against. In their rush towards the generalised and romanticised perception of enlightenment, how many are prepared to ignore the fallacies and inconvenient facts that underpin its formation? Why are the control structures that on one hand we fight against, funding a <b verifiable</b industrial scale network of teachers, gurus, leaders, and change agents, who are informing popularised philosophies, perceptions, and terminologies of a spiritual awakening?</b </center

<center Why do I find that the same controlling matrix has interwoven its influence within every financial institution, scientific discipline, religion, environmental, spiritual, and social movement? Who has the fortitude to face the sheer monumental scale of this? To look beyond their idealisms, even if it leads them to question all they hold to be true? To potentially stand-alone, to become an island in the face of an intersecting tidal wave of premeditated transformation?</center

<center <b Written by @perceptualflaws Gifs courtesy of giphy.com All public domain artwork is source referenced. </b </center